Farm Forestry
Home Feedback Page Upcoming Events Guest Book Hot Topics Regional Map Disclaimer
  Caption

A PROFILE OF THE NORTHERN NSW PRIVATE FOREST RESOURCE AND THE PRIVATE NATIVE FOREST INDUSTRY
 
4. Methodology for Updating the 2002 Study
 

4.1 The Private Native Forest Resource
 
4.1.1 Areas
 
The 2002 report presented data on the private native forest resource for 16 Local Government Areas stretching from Bellingen Shire in the south to Tweed Shire in the north and west to several Shires on the New England Tablelands (see Section 2). The study area was covered by a total of 135 topographic maps at a scale of 1:25,000.
 
Since 2002 there have been amalgamations of several LGA’s and some minor boundary changes, reducing the number of LGA’s in the study area to 13. There have also been some acquisitions of private forested land by the National Parks and Wildlife Service (now within the new Department of Environment and Conservation), although the total area has not been significant.
 
The relevant topographic maps where these LGA changes and land acquisitions have occurred since 2002 were reviewed and area and yield data updated.
 
As with the previous studies, private forest areas are categorised as follows:
  • The gross forest area.
  • The productive forest area, representing the private forest area after easily identifiable non-harvestable areas were deducted, but inclusive of constraints that may be applicable to the harvesting of that timber.
  • The net productive forest area, representing the area over which harvesting might occur after accounting for further non-harvestable areas that were not easily delineated and deducted from the productive area.
No further field checking of private forest areas or broad forest types was undertaken for this updated report.
 
4.1.2 Broad Forest Types
 
The 2002 study simplified the eleven (11) broad forest types identified from the 1994 study into six (6) broader forest associations and they have again been adopted for this updated report. The six associations are as follows:
  • Forest dominated by Spotted Gum
    Spotted Gum is the dominant species (generally comprising at least 50% of the species mix). This includes the 1994 broad forest types of Spotted Gum, Spotted Gum/Blackbutt, Spotted Gum/Ironbark and Spotted Gum/Mixed Hardwoods.
  • Forest dominated by Blackbutt
    Blackbutt is the dominant species (again generally comprising at least 50% of the species mix). This includes the 1994 broad forest types of Blackbutt, Blackbutt/Bloodwood, Blackbutt/Spotted Gum and Blackbutt/Mixed Hardwoods.
  • Moist Mixed Hardwoods
    As for the 1994 study, moist mixed forests of the coastal and hinterland areas with indicator species including Sydney Blue Gum, Tallowwood, Flooded Gum and Brush Box.
  • Dry Mixed Hardwoods
    As for the 1994 study, coastal dry hardwood forests with indicator species including Ironbarks, Bloodwoods, Grey Gum and Grey Box.
  • New England Hardwoods
    As for the 1994 study, mixed species forests of the higher altitudes and tablelands. New England Blackbutt is a common species, along with a range of associated high altitude species including Stringybarks (E. obliqua, E. laevopinea, E. cameronii), Manna Gum (E. viminalis) and Brown Barrel (E. fastigata). Sydney Blue Gum and Tallowwood are two typically coastal species that are also found in some New England stands.
Appendix 4 is a series of photographs showing examples of the broad forest types.
 
4.1.3 Basic Site Quality Criteria
 
The broad site quality criteria used in 1994 and 2002 were retained for this review. They are as follows:
  • High Site Quality Forests on the better soils, higher rainfall, more sheltered locations. Included are the better quality moist mixed types, and the best examples of the Blackbutt, Spotted Gum and New England stands.
  • Medium Site Quality The typical average Blackbutt, Spotted Gum and New England hardwood stands and the poorer quality moist hardwood stands. In places these are also high site quality forest types that have been degraded by management practices.
  • Low Site Quality Forests on heavier soil areas, poorer exposed or steep country or near the western limits of commercial growth. Because of soils, climate, topography or aspect these forests are slow growing and often the species mix is dominated by species of little or no commercial value. In some cases they are the drier forest types that have been degraded by management practices.

 
back to the top of the page
 

< previous page            table of contents            next page >
 
Back to The Home Page
Back to the Home Page

contact us |  guest book |  hot topics |  regional map |  disclaimer
 
Copyright © 2006 by the Northern Rivers Private Forestry Development Committee
Web Design by Michael Goasdoue